Re: proposed ext4 test matrix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:49 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Per the discusison on the ext4 concall, here's a proposed ext4 test
> matrix.
> 
> 						- Ted
> 
> P.S.  There was something else I said I would send out, but I didn't
> write it down and I can't remember what it was.  Can someone remind me?
> Thanks!!
> 
> 
> 4k blocksize, no journal, nodealloc, noextents (ext2)
> 1k blocksize, no journal, nodealloc, noextents (ext2)
> 4k blocksize, journal, nodealloc, noextents (ext3)
> 1k blocksize, journal, nodealloc, noextents (ext3)
> 4k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents
> 1k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents
> 4k blocksize, nojournal, delalloc, extents
> 4k blocksize, journal, 64bits(*), delalloc, extents
> 1k blocksize, journal, 64bits(*), delalloc, extents
> 4k blocksize, nojournal, 64bits(*), delalloc, extents
> 4k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents, quota enabled
> 1k blocksize, journal, delalloc, extents, quota enabled


What tests are we wanting to run? 

  Keith Mannthey
  LTC Filesystems 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux