On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:40:34PM -0800, Manish Katiyar wrote: >>> >>> Any feedback on this ? >> >> The patch looks good, but it doesn't fix bug #26752. >> >> The root cause of that bug is the fact that ext4_sync_fs() and >> ext4_put_super() assumes that sbi has been initialized. Hi Ted, Is there anything else that I need to do to get this merged in your tree ? > > Hmm.. Actually I was looking at generic_super_shutdown() which I > thought would call ext4_put_super() only if sb->root is set, and since > I was setting sb->root explicitly to NULL in my patch in case of > failures. > > -- > Thanks - > Manish > -- Thanks - Manish -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
