On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Am I missing something? The kernel stores up to 3k worth of data, on > a 4k block file system. Whereas e2fsck patch blindly assume 2k worhth > of data regardless of the block size. The kernel patch looks ok, but > the e2fsprogs patch seems badly broken.... > > - Ted > I thought that ext4 super block on 4K block is 1K at offset 1K, so kernel only uses the remaining 2K. It may very well be that e2fsck patch only works with 4K block size properly, because I never tested it on other block sizes. Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
