On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 09:53:43PM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:53:45AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: >> > [1048401.773270] EXT4-fs (sde8): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode. >> > Opts: (null) >> > [1048702.736011] EXT4-fs (sde8): error count: 3 >> > [1048702.736016] EXT4-fs (sde8): initial error at 1289053677: >> > ext4_journal_start_sb:251 >> > [1048702.736018] EXT4-fs (sde8): last error at 1289080948: ext4_put_super:719 >> >> That's actually not an error. It's a report which is generated every >> 24 hours, indicating that there has been 3 errors since the last time >> the error count has been cleared, with the first error taking place at >> Sat Nov 6 10:27:57 2010 (US/Eastern) in the function >> ext4_journal_start_sb(), at line 251, and the most recent error taking >> place at Sat Nov 6 18:02:28 2010 (US/Eastern), in the function >> ext4_put_super() at line 719. This is a new feature which was added >> in 2.6.36. > > Nice. But the issue you're not mentioning is: What errors could have > happened on the 6th of november? Should Con worry about those errors? > Ted, I would like to use this opportunity to remind you about my record_journal_errstr() implementation, see: https://github.com/amir73il/ext4-snapshots/blob/next3-stable/fs/next3/super.c#L157 It records the initial errors messages (which I found to be the most interesting), in a message buffer on the unused space after the journal super block (3K on a 4K block fs). fsck prints out those messages and clears the buffer. In under a year of Next3 fs in beta and production, it has helped me many times to analyse bugs post-mortem and find the problem. If there is demand, I can post the patch for Ext4. Amir. > OK, the chances are that he has rebooted since november, and that an > older fsck fixed the errors, but not cleared the "fs errror log". Would > these errors have triggered a "remount-readonly" if the fs was mounted > like that? > > I don't reboot that often: > > obelix:~> uptime > 09:16:19 up 175 days, 19:04, 19 users, load average: 110.10, 110.61, 111.22 > > (and yes, the load is quite high on that machine. I won't polute this > thread about that....) > > Roger. > > -- > ** R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** > ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** > *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* > Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. > Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! > Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
