Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: handle exactly-16T filesystems in resize2fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:

> The 1.42 version is on the main "master" and "next" branch, where
> "next" is where I'll check in things initially, and then "master"
> catches up with "next".  I took this from git, with the basic idea
> being that if there are people who are testing next, and people who
> are using the "master", hopefully problems get noticed and fixed
> before people are using "master" grab a commit.  To be honest there
> probably aren't enough people tracking next and master for this to
> make a huge amount of difference, but I'm following this scheme
> anyway.

So, I am doing the right thing, when I use the master branch for my 20TB
filesystem? Or shall I try next, at least until I decide to actually use
the filesystem for something real?

-- 
Stephan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux