Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: handle exactly-16T filesystems in resize2fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:00:26AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> 
> which version of e2fsprogs are you referring to ? When I look at master
> branch I can see than those changes are already in there. Except the check
> if the new size is too large. Am I missing something ?

The 1.41.x series is on the "maint" branch.

The 1.42 version is on the main "master" and "next" branch, where
"next" is where I'll check in things initially, and then "master"
catches up with "next".  I took this from git, with the basic idea
being that if there are people who are testing next, and people who
are using the "master", hopefully problems get noticed and fixed
before people are using "master" grab a commit.  To be honest there
probably aren't enough people tracking next and master for this to
make a huge amount of difference, but I'm following this scheme
anyway.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux