On 11/12/10 5:26 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote: > The real issue we want to debug with the patch below actually came up while > stress testing Lustre using the RHEL5.5 kernel (so 2.6.32'ish ext4), but a > more verbose error function should not hurt for vanilla ext4 either. > > make ext4_valid_block_bitmap() more verbose > > While running our stress test suite, ext4_valid_block_bitmap() > frequently complains about an invalid block bitmap. > However, e2fsck does not find anything. So in oder to be able > to better debug this issue, make the function more verbose and > let it complain about the two possible invalid bitmaps. Making a raw e2image of the problematic filesystem would let us take a look at why e2fsck isn't finding problems; unless you plan to fix that yourself as well, which is just fine of course. :) -Eric > Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
