Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix redirty_page_for_writepage() typo in comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Wu Fengguang wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 1916164..b82fbd9 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3357,7 +3357,7 @@ int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode)
>  	 * doing I/O at all.
>  	 *
>  	 * We could call write_cache_pages(), and then redirty all of
> -	 * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writeback() but that
> +	 * the pages by calling redirty_page_for_writepage() but that
>  	 * would be ugly in the extreme.  So instead we would need to
>  	 * replicate parts of the code in the above functions,
>  	 * simplifying them becuase we wouldn't actually intend to

This fix doesn't seem to be present in linux-next as of today, so I have 
picked it up. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux