On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:31:54AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 12 April 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > It looks like this is all about .35 material. > > > > This is going to be hard to have a separate tree to pushdown/remove > > the bkl in the mount path if it depends on the ext2 tree. > > The pushdown can be in a separate tree that can be merged independently, > just the final patch removing it in do_new_mount needs to wait > for everything else to get merged first. Right. > We have some other patches, > in particular the one that makes CONFIG_BKL modular that have to > wait for other patches and should probably just be applied separately > rather than merged from a bisectable git tree. > > Arnd Ok, no problem then. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
