On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:41:40PM +0200, Jan Blunck wrote: > In this series I've collected the patches that prepare ext2 for BKL removal. > It consist mostly of cleanups and additionally introduces a spinlock to protect > some of the superblock's fields against concurrent access. I've addressed the > feedback kindly provided by Ogawa-san by moving the ext2_write_super() out of > ext2_setup_super(). > > These patches have been part of the BKL removal series that I have posted in > November 2009 already. Since this is more than just removing the usage of the > big lock I repost it separately for inclusion. This series, at least the last > patch that includes the s_lock, needs to be merged before Frederics bkl-removal > branch, if he merges the rest of my patches there. It looks like this is all about .35 material. This is going to be hard to have a separate tree to pushdown/remove the bkl in the mount path if it depends on the ext2 tree. What about putting that with the fs bkl removal tree? Would that conflict with other changes in the ext2 tree? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
