Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> From: From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There was a bug reported on RHEL5 that a 10G dd on a 12G box
> had a very, very slow sync after that.
>
> At issue was the loop in write_cache_pages scanning all the way
> to the end of the 10G file, even though the subsequent call
> to mpage_da_submit_io would only actually write a smallish amt; then
> we went back to the write_cache_pages loop ... wasting tons of time
> in calling __mpage_da_writepage for thousands of pages we would
> just revisit (many times) later.
>
> Upstream it's not such a big issue for sys_sync because we get
> to the loop with a much smaller nr_to_write, which limits the loop.
>
> However, talking with Aneesh he realized that fsync upstream still
> gets here with a very large nr_to_write and we face the same problem.
>
> This patch makes mpage_add_bh_to_extent stop the loop after we've
> accumulated 2048 pages, by setting mpd->io_done = 1; which ultimately
> causes the write_cache_pages loop to break.
>
> Repeating the test with a dirty_ratio of 80 (to leave something for
> fsync to do), I don't see huge IO performance gains, but the reduction
> in cpu usage is striking: 80% usage with stock, and 2% with the
> below patch. Instrumenting the loop in write_cache_pages clearly
> shows that we are wasting time here.
>
> Eventually we need to change mpage_da_map_pages() also submit its I/O
> to the block layer, subsuming mpage_da_submit_io(), and then change it
> call ext4_get_blocks() multiple times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This is the slightly revised version of Eric's patch that I've added to
> the ext4 patch queue. -- Ted
Seems fine, thanks.
-Eric
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 5c6ca10..2c12926 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2349,6 +2349,15 @@ static void mpage_add_bh_to_extent(struct mpage_da_data *mpd,
> sector_t next;
> int nrblocks = mpd->b_size >> mpd->inode->i_blkbits;
>
> + /*
> + * XXX Don't go larger than mballoc is willing to allocate
> + * This is a stopgap solution. We eventually need to fold
> + * mpage_da_submit_io() into this function and then call
> + * ext4_get_blocks() multiple times in a loop
> + */
> + if (nrblocks >= 8*1024*1024/mpd->inode->i_sb->s_blocksize)
> + goto flush_it;
> +
> /* check if thereserved journal credits might overflow */
> if (!(EXT4_I(mpd->inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL)) {
> if (nrblocks >= EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
