Re: [PATCH] ext4: group cache is added in ext4_mb_discard_preallocations()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 08:58:36PM +0800, jing zhang wrote:
> 2010/4/7, tytso@xxxxxxx <tytso@xxxxxxx>:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:34:41PM +0800, jing zhang wrote:
> >>
> >> --- linux-2.6.32/fs/ext4/mballoc.c	2009-12-03 11:51:22.000000000 +0800
> >> +++ ext4_mm_leak/mballoc-14.c	2010-04-01 20:35:58.000000000 +0800
> >> @@ -4299,7 +4299,7 @@ repeat:
> >>  		}
> >>  	} else {
> >>  		freed  = ext4_mb_discard_preallocations(sb, ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len);
> >> -		if (freed)
> >> +		if (freed && freed >= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len)
> >>  			goto repeat;
> >>  		*errp = -ENOSPC;
> >>  		ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 0;
> >
> > This is just wrong.
> >
> > Since you didn't give a justification, I'm not sure why you think it
> > is correct.
> >
> 
> Though freed, is the amount freed bigger than needed?
> If not, it seems unnecessary to repeat.

You don't understand the code, I think.  If we've freed up any number
of blocks, it makes sense to use those blocks right away.  Mballoc()
is allowed to return fewer blocks than what was requested.

   	      	    	     	 - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux