Re: defrag deployment status (was Re: [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Some bigger things are missing in the e4defrag tool:
...
- overall layout considerations (e.g. putting files close to its directory or
  use the atime to move often used files to the beginning of a disk etc.)

Shouldn't oft-used files be placed closer to the middle? If you place them at the beginning of the file, it's only possible for the head-stack to be close to the file from the inner direction. Place them in the middle and it's possible for the head-stack to be close from the outer direction, too, which sounds like a doubling of probability. It seems that it's the least frequently used files that should be placed at one end of the disk or the other.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux