defrag deployment status (was Re: [PATCH] ext4: allow defrag (EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) in 32bit compat mode)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/07/2010 03:32 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
I have an x86_64 kernel with i386 userspace. e4defrag fails on the
EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT ioctl because it is not wired up for the compat
case. It seems that struct move_extent is compat save, only types
with fixed widths are used:
{
         __u32 reserved;         /* should be zero */
         __u32 donor_fd;         /* donor file descriptor */
         __u64 orig_start;       /* logical start offset in block for orig */
         __u64 donor_start;      /* logical start offset in block for donor */
         __u64 len;              /* block length to be moved */
         __u64 moved_len;        /* moved block length */
};

Lets just wire up EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT for the compat case.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger<borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
CCed: Akira Fujita<a-fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'm curious, what is the overall deployment status of ext4 defragging? I actually worked on this problem years ago[1], and am hopeful that I will see defragging in a Linux distribution sometime in my lifetime! ;-)

Looking at Fedora rawhide, I do not see anything resembling e4defrag in any of the RPM packages like e2fsprogs.

Thanks to everyone working on this,

	Jeff




[1] http://linux.yyz.us/misc/ext2meta.c

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux