On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:37:51AM -0500, tytso@xxxxxxx wrote:
> So I was going to submit this patch to Linus, but the last two times
> I've run xfsqa ("xfsqa -g quick" and "xfsqa -g auto"), test #126 has
> failed. If I run the test stand-alone, it passes. It's a bit of a
> head-scratcher. I'm currently backing out the patch and trying to do
> an xfsqa -g auto run to make sure this was something that had crept in
> before applying this patch, so this may very well not be this patch
> --- I certainly can't see anything wrong with it. But I thought I
> would give a heads up....
Eric and I did more looking at this, and looks like it's a busted
test. So we're considering this a false alarm for now.
(Safety Pup says: "Null terminate your arguments to fopen!")
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
