Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:31:26PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> These are the deps that I know xfstests has, to build and to run: >> >> BuildRequires: autoconf, libtool, xfsprogs-devel, e2fsprogs-devel >> BuildRequires: libacl-devel, libattr-devel, libaio-devel >> >> Requires: bash, xfsprogs, xfsdump, perl, acl, attr, bind-utils >> Requires: bc, indent, quota >> >> which isn't so bad... > > Doesn't seem to bad. Indent is afaik only needed for the weird 122 test > which doesn't apply to non-xfs filesystems. and FWIW, we do: _require_command /usr/bin/indent so it'll just not run if it's not there (the above was for an rpm attempt I made, wishing to automatically pull in everything that might possibly be needed.) -Eric >> I'm not sure an xfsprogs dependency is so onerous; plenty has depended >> on e2fsprogs through the years and we've lived with that ;) But >> the lag time for xfsprogs to use released xfs_io functionality is a >> bit of a bummer. >> >> But I guess I don't have a great answer for who else uses xfs_io: > > I use xfs_io in lots various local scripts. It's a really handly > tool for exercising some of the more weird I/O related syscalls. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
