Re: Please reserve INCOMPAT flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:25:46AM +0200, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Ted,
> in addition to the data-in-dirent INCOMPAT flag Rahul sent the patches
> for last week, I would like to ensure that we also have the INCOMPAT
> flag for large EA-in-inode flag reserved.  This patch is going into
> testing at one of our large customers, and I want to make sure that
> we don't accidentally get a conflicting INCOMPAT flag assignment.
> 
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE	0x0400
> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DIRDATA   0x1000
> 
> #define EXT4_EA_INODE_FL	0x00200000 /* Inode used for large EA */
> 

Reserving... but stupid question, do you know if anyone is currently
using the inode flag 0x00100000?  I want to make sure that's properly
documented and reserved.

Thanks,

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux