On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:11 +0200, Surbhi Palande wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Frank Mayhar wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:02 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > >> My first thought was that this was a bandaid too, but I guess it can > >> come about due to on-disk corruption for any reason, so it should > >> be handled gracefully, and I suppose this approach seems fine. > >> > > > > That's why we've been running with it, yes. > > > > > >> Since this is catching on-disk corruption, though, it'd be better to call > >> ext4_error() and let the mount-time error-handling policy decide what to do. > >> > >> I like having more info but below seems awfully wordy ;) Maybe the first > >> printk would suffice, and switching it to an ext4_error() would be best, > >> I think. > >> > > > > Okay, I'll rework the patch a bit and resubmit it. > > > Since I published this patch first against a reported upstream bug, I > will work on the comments and resubmit the patch! Okay, go for it, thanks. -- Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx> Google, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html