Re: [PATCH] replaced BUG() with return -EIO from ext4_ext_get_blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:11 +0200, Surbhi Palande wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> 
> Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:02 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >   
> >> My first thought was that this was a bandaid too, but I guess it can
> >> come about due to on-disk corruption for any reason, so it should
> >> be handled gracefully, and I suppose this approach seems fine.
> >>     
> >
> > That's why we've been running with it, yes.
> >
> >   
> >> Since this is catching on-disk corruption, though, it'd be better to call
> >> ext4_error() and let the mount-time error-handling policy decide what to do.
> >>
> >> I like having more info but below seems awfully wordy ;)  Maybe the first
> >> printk would suffice, and switching it to an ext4_error() would be best,
> >> I think.
> >>     
> >
> > Okay, I'll rework the patch a bit and resubmit it.
> >   
> Since I published this patch first against a reported upstream bug, I
> will work on the comments and resubmit the patch!

Okay, go for it, thanks.
-- 
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Google, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux