Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > If it only was this simple. We don't have 'check brakes' (aka
> > 'journalling ineffective') warning light. If we had that, I would not
> > have problem.
> 
> But we do; comptently designed (and in the cast of software RAID,
> competently packaged) RAID subsystems send notifications to the system
> administrator when there is a hard drive failure.  Some hardware RAID
> systems will send a page to the system administrator.  A mid-range
> Areca card has a separate ethernet port so it can send e-mail to the
> administrator, even if the OS is hosed for some reason.

Well, my MMC/uSD cards do not have ethernet ports to remind me that
they are unreliable :-(.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux