Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:

The metadata is just a way to get to my data, while the data
is actually important.

Personally, I care about metadata consistency, and ext3 documentation
suggests that journal protects its integrity. Except that it does not
on broken storage devices, and you still need to run fsck there.

as the ext3 authors have stated many times over the years, you still need
to run fsck periodicly anyway.

Where is that documented?

linux-kernel mailing list archives.

David Lang

I very much agree with that, but when suse10
switched periodic fsck off, I could not find any docs to show that it
is bad idea.
								Pavel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux