Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> The metadata is just a way to get to my data, while the data
>>> is actually important.
>>
>> Personally, I care about metadata consistency, and ext3 documentation
>> suggests that journal protects its integrity. Except that it does not
>> on broken storage devices, and you still need to run fsck there.
>
> as the ext3 authors have stated many times over the years, you still need 
> to run fsck periodicly anyway.

Where is that documented? I very much agree with that, but when suse10
switched periodic fsck off, I could not find any docs to show that it
is bad idea.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux