On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 10:47 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Mingming wrote:
> > When enable EXT_DEBUG I got the following compile warning on PPC64
> >
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
> > fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’:
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> > fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’:
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o
> >
> > The patch fixed compile warning.
>
> and a little bit more ... :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > @@ -2105,7 +2105,8 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
> > else
> > uninitialized = 0;
> >
> > - ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
> > + ext_debug("remove ext %u:[%d]%d\n", ex_ee_block,
> > + ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex), ex_ee_len);
> > path[depth].p_ext = ex;
>
> Shouldn't part of this be in your next patch, [PATCH]Show unwritten
> extent flag in ext4_ext_show_leaf() ?
>
ah, that's right, I will resend the two patches :)
Mingming
> Thanks,
> -Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
