Mingming wrote:
> When enable EXT_DEBUG I got the following compile warning on PPC64
>
> CC [M] fs/ext4/inode.o
> CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
> fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_rm_leaf’:
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2097: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> fs/ext4/extents.c: In function ‘ext4_ext_get_blocks’:
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2789: warning: format ‘%u’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘long unsigned int’
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2852: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘ext4_lblk_t’
> fs/ext4/extents.c:2953: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘unsigned int’
> CC [M] fs/ext4/migrate.o
>
> The patch fixed compile warning.
and a little bit more ... :)
> Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.31-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ linux-2.6.31-rc4/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -2105,7 +2105,8 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struc
> else
> uninitialized = 0;
>
> - ext_debug("remove ext %lu:%u\n", ex_ee_block, ex_ee_len);
> + ext_debug("remove ext %u:[%d]%d\n", ex_ee_block,
> + ext4_ext_is_uninitialized(ex), ex_ee_len);
> path[depth].p_ext = ex;
Shouldn't part of this be in your next patch, [PATCH]Show unwritten
extent flag in ext4_ext_show_leaf() ?
Thanks,
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
