Re: [PATCH 1/5] jbd: Fail to load a journal if it is too short

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 21-07-09 17:35:48, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:19:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > It's odd that sb->s_first/s_maxlen are 32-bit and
> > journal->j_first/j_last are unsigned long.
> > 
> > These things will only ever be 32-bit unless we change the journal
> > superblock.
> 
> In general, if there is any use of "unsigned long" in fs/ext[34], it's
> probably a bug.  This is because ulong is 32-bits on x86, and 64-bits
> on x86_64, so it just wastes memory space on 64-bit platforms.  The
> one exception to this is if the field in question is used by the
> standard bitops functions, which only functions correctly on "unsigned
> long".
  That's a good point. I'll write a cleanup patch at least for the obvious
offenders.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux