On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:04:15 +0200 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Due to on disk corruption, it can happen that journal is too short. Fail > to load it in such case so that we don't oops somewhere later. > > Reported-by: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > --- > fs/jbd/journal.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/jbd/journal.c b/fs/jbd/journal.c > index 737f724..94a64a1 100644 > --- a/fs/jbd/journal.c > +++ b/fs/jbd/journal.c > @@ -848,6 +848,12 @@ static int journal_reset(journal_t *journal) > > first = be32_to_cpu(sb->s_first); > last = be32_to_cpu(sb->s_maxlen); > + if (first + JFS_MIN_JOURNAL_BLOCKS > last + 1) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "JBD: Journal too short (blocks %lu-%lu).\n", > + first, last); > + journal_fail_superblock(journal); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > > journal->j_first = first; > journal->j_last = last; It's odd that sb->s_first/s_maxlen are 32-bit and journal->j_first/j_last are unsigned long. These things will only ever be 32-bit unless we change the journal superblock. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html