Re: [RFC PATCH 10/17] signed int -> blk64_t to fix bugs at 2^31 - 2^32 blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 09:38:12PM -0500, Valerie Aurora Henson wrote:
> 
> Agreed.  Ted, is this a good format for you or do you want me to
> regenerate against something?
> 

No, this is fine.  I'll take the patch and merge it into maint.

Note, what I'm going to try to do is to take entire patches of yours
at once, although in some cases they will be applied to different
branches (or split into different patches).

The goal will be to not disturb things too badly if you do any further
work on the patch series, since git-rebase should be smart enough.
However, it might be a good idea for you to set a tag on what you've
pushed so far, and to save everything past that point as diffs in case
git rebase doesn't work out for whatever reason.

Hopefully while I'm in Japan and/or over Thanksgiving weekend I'll
have enough time to merge all of these patches into mainline.  (I'll
probably miss next week's conference call as well since I'll be in
Tokyo, BTW.  If someone can take notes during the call, or at least
for anything that needs my attention, I'd appreciate it.)

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux