On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:57:42PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2008 19:43 -0800, Valerie Aurora Henson wrote:
> > diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c b/lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
> > index 7235f7d..71ad445 100644
> > --- a/lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
> > +++ b/lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
> > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_allocate_group_table(ext2_filsys fs, dgrp_t group,
> > - int prev_block = 0;
> > + blk64_t prev_block = 0;
>
> > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_allocate_group_table(ext2_filsys fs, dgrp_t group,
> > if (flexbg_size) {
> > - int prev_block = 0;
> > + blk64_t prev_block = 0;
>
> These appear to be defects in the base code and should be landed ASAP
> (as int -> blk_t) independently of this patch series.
Agreed. Ted, is this a good format for you or do you want me to
regenerate against something?
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
