On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:06:07PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> +static void ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
> + ext4_group_t group,
> + struct ext4_free_data *entry)
> +{
...
> + if (n->rb_left) {
> + new_entry = rb_entry(n->rb_left, struct ext4_free_data, node);
> + ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(sb, bitmap, group, new_entry);
> + }
> + if (n->rb_right) {
> + new_entry = rb_entry(n->rb_right, struct ext4_free_data, node);
> + ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(sb, bitmap, group, new_entry);
> + }
ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist() is recursively calling itself, which
could easily blow the stack if there are a large number of items on
the free list (remember, this can include data blocks if
!ext4_should_writeback_data()).
You should probably use rb_first and rb_next in a loop rather than a
recursive descent. I also remain concerned that
ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist() is could burn a large amount of CPU
in some cases, and as I said on the conference call, if there is a way
to avoid it, that would be a Good Thing.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
