On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:32:11PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Attached is a patch that I used for counting. > > > > Here's my results: > > # cat /debug/tracing/ftrace_null > > 45 > > # cat /debug/tracing/ftrace_nonnull > > 7 > > > > Ah, seems that there is cases where it is nonnull more often. Anyway, it > > obviously is not a fast path (total of 52). Even if it was all null, it is > > not big enough to call for the confusion. > > Silly question --- what was your test workload? Hehe, I just booted the box. The counting started right away, so I just looked at the work load. Anyway, I'm writing a generic "unlikely" profiler that should make Andrew happy. And this will also catch this case as well. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
