Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:13:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> #jbd-fix-error-handling-for-checkpoint-io.patch: double-check this >>> jbd-fix-error-handling-for-checkpoint-io.patch >>> ext3-add-checks-for-errors-from-jbd.patch >>> jbd-test-bh_write_eio-to-detect-errors-on-metadata-buffers.patch >>> >>>They improve filesystem corruption problem and it is needed by >>>mission critical systems. >>> >>>Could you tell me what is your concern (you commented, "double-check >>>this") ? Are there something that I can help? For example, I can >>>provide some SystemTap scripts to help tests. >> >>I forget my reasons for that - would need to go back and review the >>discussions when the patch was first merged. >> >>One of the above patches (I forget which) breaks the build because it >>expects the presence of Al Viro's VFS tree, and that hasn't been merged >>yet. I need to wait and see if that merge will be happening (seems >>unlikely) and if not, rework the patch against mainline. I see. Thank you for your work. > Strange; I don't recall any of the ext4 variants of the error handling > patches requiring Al's VFS tree. And I thought all of them have been > merged into Linus's tree at this point. I checked Al's VFS tree and I found commit 6ac465f99b29f74ca5a62bc32a8772985d9a071b changes codes near where one of my patch changes (in ext3/ext4_quota_on()), but not the same code. > Kawai-san, could you double check and see if I processed all of your > patches and pushed them to Linus? I was pretty sure I had... I confirmed that all of my ext4/jbd2 patches have been merged into mainline. Thank you very much! Regards, -- Hidehiro Kawai Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
