On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:13:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > #jbd-fix-error-handling-for-checkpoint-io.patch: double-check this > > jbd-fix-error-handling-for-checkpoint-io.patch > > ext3-add-checks-for-errors-from-jbd.patch > > jbd-test-bh_write_eio-to-detect-errors-on-metadata-buffers.patch > > > > They improve filesystem corruption problem and it is needed by > > mission critical systems. > > > > Could you tell me what is your concern (you commented, "double-check > > this") ? Are there something that I can help? For example, I can > > provide some SystemTap scripts to help tests. > > I forget my reasons for that - would need to go back and review the > discussions when the patch was first merged. > > One of the above patches (I forget which) breaks the build because it > expects the presence of Al Viro's VFS tree, and that hasn't been merged > yet. I need to wait and see if that merge will be happening (seems > unlikely) and if not, rework the patch against mainline. Strange; I don't recall any of the ext4 variants of the error handling patches requiring Al's VFS tree. And I thought all of them have been merged into Linus's tree at this point. Kawai-san, could you double check and see if I processed all of your patches and pushed them to Linus? I was pretty sure I had... - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
