Theodore Tso wrote:
> Just for completeness's sake, can you apply the following patch to
> dump, and then try doing a benchmark run using dump on ext4?
>
> I'm curious how it would compare.
>
> - Ted
>
> Index: dump-0.4b41/dump/traverse.c
> ===================================================================
> --- dump-0.4b41.orig/dump/traverse.c
> +++ dump-0.4b41/dump/traverse.c
> @@ -157,14 +157,6 @@ int dump_fs_open(const char *disk, ext2_
> retval = EXT2_ET_UNSUPP_FEATURE;
> ext2fs_close(*fs);
> }
> - else if ((retval = es->s_feature_incompat &
> - ~(EXT2_LIB_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP |
> - EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER))) {
> - msg("Unsupported feature(s) 0x%x in filesystem\n",
> - retval);
> - retval = EXT2_ET_UNSUPP_FEATURE;
> - ext2fs_close(*fs);
> - }
> else {
> if (es->s_feature_compat &
> EXT3_FEATURE_COMPAT_HAS_JOURNAL &&
Yep, will do. Should have included it in the run (in last, in case
anything exploded...) :)
I'm traveling but will give it a shot soon.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
