Just for completeness's sake, can you apply the following patch to
dump, and then try doing a benchmark run using dump on ext4?
I'm curious how it would compare.
- Ted
Index: dump-0.4b41/dump/traverse.c
===================================================================
--- dump-0.4b41.orig/dump/traverse.c
+++ dump-0.4b41/dump/traverse.c
@@ -157,14 +157,6 @@ int dump_fs_open(const char *disk, ext2_
retval = EXT2_ET_UNSUPP_FEATURE;
ext2fs_close(*fs);
}
- else if ((retval = es->s_feature_incompat &
- ~(EXT2_LIB_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP |
- EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER))) {
- msg("Unsupported feature(s) 0x%x in filesystem\n",
- retval);
- retval = EXT2_ET_UNSUPP_FEATURE;
- ext2fs_close(*fs);
- }
else {
if (es->s_feature_compat &
EXT3_FEATURE_COMPAT_HAS_JOURNAL &&
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
