On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You can see the full log at >> http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/log-1216380709.txt which shows that >> it already survived a lot of failures, so I'm guessing your patch was >> correct and we just hit a different case. What do you think? >> > > Yeah you are right, its like a shitty game of wack-a-mole. Heres another patch, > same thing as last time, pull the other one out put this one on. Thanks, It seems to hold up -- no stacktraces, but lots of IO failures. I would leave it in testing for a bit more, but I've got to run; I'll give it another go when I get home. You may see the log so far: http://folk.uio.no/vegardno/linux/log-1216382128.txt Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
