Re: e2fsck: Device or resource busy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:23:48AM +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> The key thing that you need to do when trying to recover from RAID
>> setups where you are missing one or more disks is to align the pieces
>> so they are in their original places, with the missing pieces replaced
>> with a /dev/zero device.
>
> Hm, interesting, I did not consider that yet. Thanks for the links, I'll 
> have a look. But again: I don't really care for the data, I was just 
> playing around and wondering why it reported "Device or resource busy"
> when I expected something like "unable to find superblock".

That will only happen if someone else has opened the device with
O_EXCL.  Are you sure you didn't ^Z an e2fsck or some such and then
started a second one, or some such?  

Is this repeatable?

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux