Eric Sandeen wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> It's a bit shocking how much this matters to the size of >> ext4_mb_release_inode_pa etc; I've not yet found the >> reason why. > > Oh, well, duh - its' the big 108 byte allocation context on the > stack.... and if it's not used it gets optimized away. > > I think it's worth looking at allocating that one. Ok, hold off on that patch for now, sorry, looking at it more I think it should be done better. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
