Eric Sandeen wrote: > It's a bit shocking how much this matters to the size of > ext4_mb_release_inode_pa etc; I've not yet found the > reason why. Oh, well, duh - its' the big 108 byte allocation context on the stack.... and if it's not used it gets optimized away. I think it's worth looking at allocating that one. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html