Re: [PATCH 1/1] Extent overlap bugfix in ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:07:01AM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Alex Tomas wrote:
> >I think that stuff that converts uninitialized blocks
> >to initialized ones should be a separate codepath and
> >shouldn't be done in the insert path. and an insert
> >(basic tree manipulation) should BUG_ON() one tries
> >to add extent with a block which is already covered
> >by the tree.
> >
> >IMHO, get_blocks() should look like:
> >
> >  path = find_path()
> >  if (found extent covers request block(s)) {
> >    if (extent is uninitialized) {
> >      convert();
> >    }
> >  }
> >
> >where
> >   function convert()
> >  {
> >    /* adopt existing extent so that it
> >     * doesn't cover requested blocks */
> >
> >    /* insert head or tail of existing
> >     * extent, if necessary */
> >
> >    /* insert new extent of initialized blocks */
> >  }
> >
> >thanks, Alex
> 
> I was thing about the same thing. The current ext4_ext_get_blocks()
> function becomes very bulky. The code to convert uninitialized blocks to
> initialized ones is pretty selfcontained, and worth the effort to put it
> into a seperate function.

Ok. I will move this code to a new function.

--
Regards,
Amit Arora
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux