On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 05:51:24PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > > > For the set: > > > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks! Will rebase, retest and submit v1 > > Shouldn't the version numbers be independent of the RFC/PATCH > designation (and thus this would be a v2)? I know I was extremely > confused when I had to review a series by Colin Foster which jumped back > and forth between PATCH v6, RFC v3, PATCH v7, etc. Makes sense. Will mark it v2
