On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 03:30:07PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > > For the set: > > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks! Will rebase, retest and submit v1 Shouldn't the version numbers be independent of the RFC/PATCH designation (and thus this would be a v2)? I know I was extremely confused when I had to review a series by Colin Foster which jumped back and forth between PATCH v6, RFC v3, PATCH v7, etc.
