On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 09:43:34AM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 22:27, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is how I always run them, and it worked fine with both Debian > > (where it's easy to add missing packages to the rootfs) or with a more > > embedded-oriented Buildroot. > > I am not entirely clear of your idea. You need somehow to boot into a > system with the patched net-next kernel You have to do that anyway for any kind of kernel work, no? > or you have a virtual machine boot into a virtual OS. I guess it is > the last option you refer to using Debian? You could do that too, but you don't have to. Debian, like many other Linux distributions, supports a wide variety of CPU architectures; it can be run on embedded systems just as well as on desktop PCs or VMs. I didn't say you have to use Debian, though, I just said I ran the selftests on a Debian-based rootfs and that it was easy to prepare the environment there. The Debian rootfs and the selftests were deployed to the target board with the DSA switch on it, in case that wasn't clear.
