On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:41:51PM +0200, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 2022-08-23 08:48, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > > I'm not good at naming, but "blackhole" is at least consistent with what > > we already have for routes and nexthop objects. > > > > I have changed it the name "masked", as that is also the term used in the > documentation for the zero-DPV entries, and I think that it will generally > be a more accepted term. "blackhole" is an already accepted term and at least to me it is much more clear than "masked". Keep in mind that both L2 neighbours (FDB) and L3 neighbours share the same uAPI and eventually we might want to extend the use of this flag for L3 neighbours (at least Spectrum supports it), so it needs to make sense for both.
