On tor, jun 02, 2022 at 13:39, Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 01:30:06PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >> On 02/06/2022 13:17, Hans Schultz wrote: >> > On tor, jun 02, 2022 at 12:33, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 02/06/2022 12:17, Hans Schultz wrote: >> >>> On tis, maj 31, 2022 at 17:23, Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:34:21AM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: >> > >> >>> Another issue is that >> >>> bridge fdb add MAC dev DEV master static >> >>> seems to add the entry with the SELF flag set, which I don't think is >> >>> what we would want it to do or? >> >> >> >> I don't see such thing (hacked iproute2 to print the flags before cmd): >> >> $ bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev vnet110 master static >> >> flags 0x4 >> >> >> >> 0x4 = NTF_MASTER only >> >> >> > >> > I also get 0x4 from iproute2, but I still get SELF entries when I look >> > with: >> > bridge fdb show dev DEV >> > >> >> after the above add: >> $ bridge fdb show dev vnet110 | grep 00:11 >> 00:11:22:33:44:55 master virbr0 static > > I think Hans is testing with mv88e6xxx which dumps entries directly from > HW via ndo_fdb_dump(). See dsa_slave_port_fdb_do_dump() which sets > NTF_SELF. > > Hans, are you seeing the entry twice? Once with 'master' and once with > 'self'? > Well yes, but I get some additional entries with 'self' for different vlans. So from clean adding a random fdb entry I get 4 entries on the port, 2 with 'master' and two with 'self'. It looks like this: # bridge fdb add 00:22:33:44:55:66 dev eth6 master static # bridge fdb show dev eth6 | grep 55 00:22:33:44:55:66 vlan 1 master br0 offload static 00:22:33:44:55:66 master br0 offload static 00:22:33:44:55:66 vlan 1 self static 00:22:33:44:55:66 vlan 4095 self static If I do a replace of a locked entry I only get one with the 'self' flag.
