On 08/04/17 16:49, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 09:30:42AM -0400, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:41:58 +0300
>> <idosch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> static void br_dev_free(struct net_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> - struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> -
>>> - free_percpu(br->stats);
>>> free_netdev(dev);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Since the only thing left is free_netdev, you can now just set dev->destructor
>> to be free_netdev.
>
> Fine.
>
> Beside stylistic issues, I would appreciate comments on how this should
> be handled. Are we reverting the patch in the Fixes line or applying
> this patchset?
>
> I prefer the first option. Then after net is merged into net-next I can
> re-post this patchset with the requested changes.
>
+1
