On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 09:30:42AM -0400, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2017 14:41:58 +0300
> <idosch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > static void br_dev_free(struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > - struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
> > -
> > - free_percpu(br->stats);
> > free_netdev(dev);
> > }
> >
>
> Since the only thing left is free_netdev, you can now just set dev->destructor
> to be free_netdev.
Fine.
Beside stylistic issues, I would appreciate comments on how this should
be handled. Are we reverting the patch in the Fixes line or applying
this patchset?
I prefer the first option. Then after net is merged into net-next I can
re-post this patchset with the requested changes.
