Re: Bridge suddenly only passes traffic if in promiscuous mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/08/2011 02:47 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 02/08/2011 11:29 AM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a bridge to various interfaces. There is an IP address on the
>> bridge, and hosts on the interfaces connected to the bridge use the
>> bridge's IP address as a gateway. STP is off and the forwarding delay is
>> set to 0.
>>
>> This has been working fine, however, today I needed to change around
>> some IPv6 addresses on the connected hosts. I made the IPv6 changes and
>> rebooted those boxes, only to find that suddenly no traffic -- IPv4 *or*
>> IPv6 -- was passing through the bridge.
>>
>> When I pulled up tshark to see what was going on, traffic suddenly
>> started flowing again. And even as I type this, as long as tshark is
>> running on that interface (no matter what the capture filter is),
>> traffic is flowing. The moment I stop tshark from running, traffic
>> stops. IOW, the bridge is only passing traffic while in promiscuous mode.
>>
>> I didn't change the IP address on the bridge itself. As far as I can
>> tell I didn't do anything odd whatsoever. But I have no idea what's
>> causing this and I'd really like to not reboot the box if at all possible.
>>
>> Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this and/or how to
>> troubleshoot this?
>
> What kernel version?
>
> And, you are sniffing the physical interface, or the bridge?
>
> Maybe send us output of brctl show, and ifconfig -a?
>
> Promisc bit is sometimes hard to detect properly, so if you can, please
> post /sys/class/net/[iface-name]/flags
> If bit 0x100 is set, the NIC is actually promisc, regardless of what
> ifconfig -a shows.

I found other funky behavior (sendmsg denied when trying to ping via 
IPv6) and users had trouble accessing services on the box, so I already 
initiated a reboot of the box -- I need those services up. :-|

If it happens again I'll be sure to get you that info.

However, here's what I *can* provide:
2.6.36 kernel, and sniffing the bridge. (There's actually no physical 
interface on the bridge -- this is on purpose, to prevent any problems 
on the bridge from affecting the one physical interface on the box, and 
thus my ability to get in and fix things.)

--Jeff
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux