David Miller wrote: > From: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:39:35 +0800 > >> How could you let the bridge know netpoll is not sent to >> the one that doesn't support netpoll during setup? This will >> be complex, I am afraid. > > Why does this matter at all? Because currently we check netpoll support by ->ndo_poll_controller, for example, tap driver doesn't have ->ndo_poll_controller now, if I choose the target "@192.168.0.2/br0" where "192.168.0.2" is owned by "tap0" which is managed by "br0", netconsole may not work. > > I told you in another mail that we should do away with > these callbacks and all the crazy 'npinfo' assignments > and just do it in the generic code. I think ->ndo_poll_controller is not in the case that you talked about. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
