From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:51:01 -0500 > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 12:39 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: >> Matt Mackall wrote: >> How could you let the bridge know netpoll is not sent to >> the one that doesn't support netpoll during setup? This will >> be complex, I am afraid. > > I thought I saw a simple loop over bridge devices at poll time in your > patch. So it should be a simple matter of skipping unsupported devices > in that loop. It's because of all that "assign ->npinfo to slaves" crap he has to do the way his patches are currently implemented. It's basically another sign that the design is wrong. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
