On Friday 13 November 2009, Patrick Mullaney wrote: > > The macvlan driver didn't allow for creation/deletion of devices > by other in-kernel modules. This patch provides common routines > for both in-kernel and netlink based management. This patch > also enables macvlan device support for gro for lower level > devices that support gro. I wonder if doing this way round is a good idea, why don't you just use netlink to set up the endpoint device like the current macvlan and macvtap do? I think doing it consistently for all backends would be a significant advantage. Arnd <>< _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
