But STP is disabled on the bridge interface, then also "setfd to zero" it will work? Or should I enable the STP first?
With Regards
Rahul Bhardwaj
--- On Mon, 17/11/08, Francesco Dolcini <fdolcini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Francesco Dolcini <fdolcini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bridge ports needlessly going through learning stage when STP is disabled
To: "rahul bhardwaj" <rahul_bhardwaj36in@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, 17 November, 2008, 1:56 AM
rahul bhardwaj wrote:
> Is this the right behavior ? The 15 to 30 second delay
before the
> port moves to Forwarding state can be frustrating, as you don't
> expect it, and for that period of time, start to think there is
> something else wrong in the network's configuration. Is there any
> place in the code where I do some change to resolve this issue.
At the moment the normal way to handle this is "brctl setfd $BR_DEV
0"
-Francesco
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
|
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy!
Invite them now._______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
